![]() ![]() On top of that, their activity is much less likely to trigger a red flag within the network and various tools network intrusion tools, like firewalls, are ineffective against inside threats. Insiders not only have direct access to sensitive data but also knowledge about internal operations and processes. However, information security practitioners need to pay attention to insiders because these actors can inflict more damage. In recent years, external attacks have increasingly become sources of large data breaches. It’s a common misconception that outside cyberattackers are behind every network or data breach. They can pose a serious threat because they’re determined to reach their goals and are increasingly garnering the resources they need to carry out their agenda. Their attacks often follow a pattern and similar tools and techniques. Hacktivists may act alone or in groups, as well as recruit a large army of like-minded hackers. ![]() As the name implies, hacktivists are on a mission of some sort, and this could be anything from making a political statement to damaging an organization whose views they oppose. The term hacktivist is derived from the words hacker and activist. Various individuals within the organized ring specialize, whether it’s in hacking, managing exploits or even “customer service,” and they invest funds into acquiring technology and automation to improve their return on investment. Organized cybercriminals operate in a way like a business, albeit an underground one. These cyber rings also engage in more sophisticated ransomware attacks. That means they typically target data that has a high value on the dark market, such as personally identifiable information (PII) and banking information. Researchers have also been observing international collaboration between different groups of state-sponsored actors.Īnother highly sophisticated category, organized-crime actors are different from state-sponsored ones in that they are most likely to be motivated by profits. ![]() ![]() This category of attackers is well-funded and operates within an extensive support infrastructure that includes multiple hacker networks. They may also after intellectual property data that could ultimately give the sponsoring nation a competitive advantage on the international market. Their reasons may lie in national security, political espionage, military intelligence and even attempts to influence another nation’s political process. But more typically, nation-state actors are not motivated by direct financial gain. Some countries use these sophisticated players to fund their regime. In recent years, many high-profile attacks have been attributed to nation-state actors. Nation-state actors focus on several attack vectors simultaneously and exploit a number of vulnerabilities. APTs can move laterally through a network and blend in with regular traffic - one of the reasons they can go undetected for months and years and inflict a high degree of damage to an organization. They’re capable of carrying out large-scale attacks as well as advanced persistent threats (APTs), which are stealthy attacks whose purpose is to maintain a presence in the network for an extensive period of time, typically to collect targeted types of data. Actors sponsored by nation-states are characterized by a high level of sophistication and resources. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |